Sunday, January 10, 2016

PB 1A

There are endless genres that can be observed in the field of writing, one of them being a syllabus. The syllabus is usually a few page document written by the professor which contains necessary information about an upcoming class you have enrolled in. The paper “Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis” written by Laura Carroll discusses the key components in rhetorical analysis which include context, audience, purpose, style, and tone. A major element of rhetorical analysis is context, or in other words the particular situation. The context is made up of three pieces, audience, exigence (“the circumstance or condition that invites a response”), and constraints. The first of piece is audience, and a syllabus has a rather specific one. The document is distributed to the class participants, as the information provided is only relevant to them. Often times due dates, contact information, conduct rules, and grading information is included, which is, as previously stated, only of much value to those taking the class. The syllabus can be utilized to however great of an extent that an audience member chooses to use it, which will likely vary amongst the group. This is, however, only the intended audience of the genre and fails to include the unintended audience. Perhaps a fellow student who is considering taking that class at a future time would view the syllabus, or a supervisor or head of a department who is checking to see what the instructor has planned for the course. There are few constraints for a syllabus since it is up to the instructor what will or will not be included in his or her personal version. Theoretically, if a professor wanted to make a syllabus that spanned 100 pages, that is an option—however, if it would be used would then likely be questionable.
The purpose of a syllabus is the feature that likely has the simplest answer—to provide information. Professors often use a syllabus to put together the answers to questions that students will most likely ask in the future. Thus, it acts as a go-to document for all things related to the course. These questions may be “When are your office hours?,” “What is your absence policy?” or “When is the midterm?.” These, along with many others, could then all be answered by the response “refer to the syllabus,” and therefore it is indeed serving its purpose
Finally, the style and tone of this particular genre is generally very formal. An electronic version of a syllabus is almost always available online, and is sometimes accompanied by a printed copy. The nature of the genre is often to be as concise as possible while still covering all necessary information. Thus, sometimes a syllabus will be one page, and other times it will be several. A syllabus often has titles above short paragraphs about each aspect of the class that the professor finds important to express. In these statements, the tone is less geared toward being particularly friendly or strict, but rather to be clear. That is, as its purpose states, the goal of the genre.

3 comments:

  1. Samantha,

    First off, I would like to say that the layout of your response was very well put together. You first addressed what points you would discuss in referring to the rhetorical analysis of a genre. You then went on to discuss those specific points and were very clear about it. Specifically in reference to the syllabus, you informed the reader about what conventions make a syllabus a syllabus. You played out exactly what to expect when seeing a syllabus and which ways would be most effective in providing students understandable and clear expectations. Overall, I believe that your pba blog was very exceptional.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kuniaski,

    I’m going to pass along some feedback I gave to another student who chose the college syllabus as its own genre. Some of the common surface-level features of syllabi: attendance policies, grading, the schedule, and a formal tone are each common aspects. If/when you dig even deeper, you might begin to see that there’s some intertextuality amongst syllabi—they might reference other documents (the UCSB Writing Program’s policies), laws (FERPA), or services (CLAS) that play a part in the local (or even national) education. So what, you might ask? Well, this all comes back to demonstrating how genres are, at their heart, social.

    I like what you wrote here: “Theoretically, if a professor wanted to make a syllabus that spanned 100 pages, that is an option—however, if it would be used would then likely be questionable.” This is precisely why it’s important for writers to think about their audience—any professor who would expect his/her student (or even their other instructor-colleagues, administration, or the public) to read through a 100-page document in the short span it takes to get all that crucial information across (~ a week) would be out of their mind. ☺ As you stated, genres have goals—some explicit, some tacit—and if you can see that, you’re well on your way towards understanding genres!

    Z

    ReplyDelete
  3. Samantha -

    Your essay was extremely thoughtful, professional, and well-written. I like how you explained some of the terms you used so that what you meant was explicitly clear to the reader. For example, you wrote "A major element of rhetorical analysis is context, or in other words the particular situation," elaborating on the meaning of context in your paper. I also really liked how you addressed all of the rhetorical features of the genre clearly but concisely. All of your points were accurately defended by examples and such. I feel that your PB1A did a good job of answering the prompt and showing that you truly understand what you're discussing. :)

    ReplyDelete