There are endless genres that can
be observed in the field of writing, one of them being a syllabus. The syllabus
is usually a few page document written by the professor which contains
necessary information about an upcoming class you have enrolled in. The paper “Steps
toward Rhetorical Analysis” written by Laura Carroll discusses the key
components in rhetorical analysis which include context, audience, purpose,
style, and tone. A major element of rhetorical analysis is context, or in other
words the particular situation. The context is made up of three pieces,
audience, exigence (“the circumstance or condition that invites a response”),
and constraints. The first of piece is audience, and a syllabus has a rather
specific one. The document is distributed to the class participants, as the
information provided is only relevant to them. Often times due dates, contact
information, conduct rules, and grading information is included, which is, as
previously stated, only of much value to those taking the class. The syllabus
can be utilized to however great of an extent that an audience member chooses
to use it, which will likely vary amongst the group. This is, however, only the
intended audience of the genre and fails to include the unintended audience.
Perhaps a fellow student who is considering taking that class at a future time
would view the syllabus, or a supervisor or head of a department who is
checking to see what the instructor has planned for the course. There are few
constraints for a syllabus since it is up to the instructor what will or will
not be included in his or her personal version. Theoretically, if a professor
wanted to make a syllabus that spanned 100 pages, that is an option—however, if
it would be used would then likely be questionable.
The purpose of a syllabus is the
feature that likely has the simplest answer—to provide information. Professors
often use a syllabus to put together the answers to questions that students
will most likely ask in the future. Thus, it acts as a go-to document for all
things related to the course. These questions may be “When are your office
hours?,” “What is your absence policy?” or “When is the midterm?.” These, along
with many others, could then all be answered by the response “refer to the
syllabus,” and therefore it is indeed serving its purpose
Finally, the style and tone of this
particular genre is generally very formal. An electronic version of a syllabus
is almost always available online, and is sometimes accompanied by a printed
copy. The nature of the genre is often to be as concise as possible while still
covering all necessary information. Thus, sometimes a syllabus will be one
page, and other times it will be several. A syllabus often has titles above
short paragraphs about each aspect of the class that the professor finds
important to express. In these statements, the tone is less geared toward being
particularly friendly or strict, but rather to be clear. That is, as its
purpose states, the goal of the genre.
Samantha,
ReplyDeleteFirst off, I would like to say that the layout of your response was very well put together. You first addressed what points you would discuss in referring to the rhetorical analysis of a genre. You then went on to discuss those specific points and were very clear about it. Specifically in reference to the syllabus, you informed the reader about what conventions make a syllabus a syllabus. You played out exactly what to expect when seeing a syllabus and which ways would be most effective in providing students understandable and clear expectations. Overall, I believe that your pba blog was very exceptional.
Kuniaski,
ReplyDeleteI’m going to pass along some feedback I gave to another student who chose the college syllabus as its own genre. Some of the common surface-level features of syllabi: attendance policies, grading, the schedule, and a formal tone are each common aspects. If/when you dig even deeper, you might begin to see that there’s some intertextuality amongst syllabi—they might reference other documents (the UCSB Writing Program’s policies), laws (FERPA), or services (CLAS) that play a part in the local (or even national) education. So what, you might ask? Well, this all comes back to demonstrating how genres are, at their heart, social.
I like what you wrote here: “Theoretically, if a professor wanted to make a syllabus that spanned 100 pages, that is an option—however, if it would be used would then likely be questionable.” This is precisely why it’s important for writers to think about their audience—any professor who would expect his/her student (or even their other instructor-colleagues, administration, or the public) to read through a 100-page document in the short span it takes to get all that crucial information across (~ a week) would be out of their mind. ☺ As you stated, genres have goals—some explicit, some tacit—and if you can see that, you’re well on your way towards understanding genres!
Z
Samantha -
ReplyDeleteYour essay was extremely thoughtful, professional, and well-written. I like how you explained some of the terms you used so that what you meant was explicitly clear to the reader. For example, you wrote "A major element of rhetorical analysis is context, or in other words the particular situation," elaborating on the meaning of context in your paper. I also really liked how you addressed all of the rhetorical features of the genre clearly but concisely. All of your points were accurately defended by examples and such. I feel that your PB1A did a good job of answering the prompt and showing that you truly understand what you're discussing. :)