Tuesday, January 12, 2016

PB1B

When I first read the prompt which focused on the concept of a “genre generator” website, I was immediately a bit confused. I know what a genre is, and what a generator should do, but the concept of putting the two together seemed foreign to me. Before trying to determine the different conventions of each of the three sites, I spent some time playing around with the different results that I could obtain from each one. The three websites each had a distinct structure each time the “generate” button was clicked, though the content within this format differed. Thus, amongst each genre there was to some extent an element of consistency that remained no matter how many versions were generated.
The first generator I looked at was Pandyland, a website which created a new comic strip with each push of a button. The comics that were generated each had three boxes which seemed to be randomly placed together. Often times I did get new boxes, but I found some to be repeated more frequently than others. Boxes that I tended to see repeated were “What” in a jagged edged bubble which I believed to imply shouting, “Um… that was awkward,” and “Hello Finlay what is up.” Some of the conventions that I found within the comic strips were conversations bubbles (with different edges likely implying different tones), animated drawings (of one or two men), emotions, entertainment, and humor (to some extent). Due to the nature of a generator website, sometimes what is generated is more successful, per say, than others. I chose to add the words “per say” in the last sentence because what is considered successful is up for interpretation. Each time a new comic was generated, it did stay true to many of the conventions; however, some made much more sense than others. Here are a few examples: the first on the less successful side, and the second on the more successful side (in my opinion).

Next is SCIgen, “An Automatic CS Paper Generator,” or as we briefly discussed in class, more so a “Nonsense Paper Generator.” At the top of the page the website notes that the goal is to “maximize amusement, rather than coherence” (SCIgen). When I typed my name into the “authors” box and clicked generate, I discovered I “had written” some rather interesting CS papers. “Simulation of Write-Back Caches,” “Emulating Simulated Annealing and Courseware,” and my personal favorite and masterpiece, “A Methodology for the Understanding of IPv7.” The conventions of this genre lie greatly in formatting, as the basis of the generator website is that the content is irrelevant. I noticed nearly every “paper” had large, bolded section titles which would typically be found in a sophisticated research paper. The headers included abstract, table of contents, introduction, methodology, related works, and so on. Another convention of these “papers” was the usage of charts and graphs which, along with the section titles, draw the reader’s attention. Both of these features, along with mature word choice, in text citations, and a reference section, cause who only skims the paper to be tricked by its illegitimacy.
Finally, I explored the Meme Generator website, which adds a few short lines of text to popular photos. After looking at the “popular page” of memes I noticed that there were a few pictures that were repeated over and over, with only the text changing. One of the main conventions of these memes seemed to be humor, though it seemed to be a specific type of “internet humor” as seemingly random images such as the “Philosoraptor” and “Grumpy Cat” must have gained popularity at some point in time. The minimal text above and below the photo is an important convention of memes as it is meant to be short and sweet—additional text may deter the reader from potentially reading the meme or otherwise finding much humor in it.

Each of these websites generates different versions of the same genre repeatedly. As I explored each of the three websites I found similar trends amongst what was generated. Each genre had a specific structure that the generator formed content into. This content may have served a purpose, as in the case of the comic strips and memes, or simply for visual aid, as in the CS papers. The generators, regardless of what was produced, incorporated the conventions of each genre, which is, essentially, why it works. A genre is unique from the rest because of its conventions. Thus, in order for these “genre generator” websites to successfully generate output of a specific genre, the creators of these genre generator websites must have established its conventions. One other example of these websites is http://songlyricsgenerator.com/step1.php, which generates music lyrics of a chosen genre!

3 comments:

  1. You have a very specific analyse over the different conventions of the three genres in terms of their structures, languages, and purposes. It is great that you used examples and quotations to support your idea. It is true that its conventions make a genre unique and a genre must have a purpose in order to be meaningful. I played with your Song Lyrics Generator a little bit and I think it is pretty interesting. I have never heard something like this before and it surprised me that it makes the creative process of lyric writing into a form. It reinforces the idea that since all genres have their own different, fixed conventions, the making of all arts must have different, fixed patterns to follow as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Samantha. At first, I was extremely confused about this assignment as well because the idea of using a random generator to explore a genre is very foreign to me. In the analysis, I really like how you paid attention the the minor details for each of the generators because in some cases, they play a vital part for the in story, like the type of speech bubble you noticed. I also agree with you that the pandyland generator did seem to reuse a lot of the pictures they provided despite the claim that they have over 74,000 pages to choose from. Your meme analysis is on point as well because you specifically mentioned that the caption should be super short and concise, something I fail to notice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Samantha,

    First off, your PB has a really nice structure to it, making it easy to read and follow along. Secondly, I think you did a really great job of breaking down each genre and explaining its conventions. I actually wrote something similar to you in regards to the SCIgen and how most of the conventions appear in the formatting. This argument really showed how the information presented could be nonsense, yet still appear to be a legitimate research paper. Going along with that, I also liked how you included the goal of the website. It supported to your argument nicely and added some interesting insight into the generator website. Awesome job!

    ReplyDelete